Skip to main content
Version: 2.0

Benchmark Evaluation

Benchmark Evaluation evaluates model performance using official datasets and standardized metrics. This approach delivers precise, quantifiable insights into real-world model capabilities.

Currently, only LLM Benchmark Single evaluation is supported.

Step 1: Configure Basic Settings

Configure the evaluation type, model(s) for your evaluation.

  • Display Name: Enter a name for this evaluation task.
  • Model Type: Select LLM. (VLM support coming soon)
  • Evaluation Method: Choose how to evaluate your model.
  • Evaluation Type: Select Single. (Comparative eval coming soon)
  • Model: Select an available model from your current workspace.
Token Consumption

Evaluation can consume a large number of model tokens. Confirm that the selected model is available and that your account has sufficient balance before proceeding.

Step 2: Select Benchmark Dataset & Metrics

Select a public benchmark dataset to objectively measure model performance against industry standards.

  1. Choose a Benchmark Dataset Choose from standard benchmarks across multiple domains:

General Knowledge & Reasoning

  • MMLU: 57 subjects across STEM, humanities, and social sciences
  • HellaSwag: Commonsense reasoning
  • DROP: Discrete reasoning and numerical inference
  • ARC: Science and world‑knowledge reasoning
  • BBH: Hard BIG‑bench subset requiring multi‑step reasoning

Math Reasoning

  • GSM8K: Multi‑step elementary math
  • MATH: Competition‑level math and formal reasoning

Code Generation

  • HumanEval: Functional correctness via unit tests

Multilingual Evaluation

  • MGSM: Multilingual GSM8K across 10 languages
  • MMMLU: Multilingual MMLU in 14 languages
  1. Select a Dataset Version Select the Lite version for a faster evaluation or the Full version for complete and accurate results.

Benchmark Evaluation


Verify all configurations, then click Start Evaluation. The evaluation progress will display in the list.


Eval-list


Step 3: View Evaluation Report

After a benchmark evaluation completes, review the detailed report to analyze model performance.

Score Overview

The Score Overview section provides a high-level summary of the evaluation results.

  • Quality Score: Represents the model's overall weighted score.
  • Evaluated Items: Shows the number of data samples evaluated out of the total.
  • Metadata: Lists key information about the job.
  • Download Results: Click to download the complete evaluation results.

Quality-score


Performance Metrics

Performance Metrics provides visual insights into your evaluation results, helping you identify where model excels.

  • Performance Comparison: The radar chart compares model capabilities across all configured metrics.

  • Detailed Metrics Comparison: Lists the exact numerical scores for each evaluation metric across all models.


Performance Metrics


Case Analysis

Review individual evaluation cases to perform error analysis and understand specific model behaviors.


case-analysis


Next Steps

Fine‑Tuning

Use evaluation insights to fine‑tune your models for improved performance.

Dataset Preparation

Create or refine datasets to enhance your next training or evaluation run.